On November 29, 2025, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy confronted one of the gravest political crises of his presidency — the abrupt resignation of his powerful chief of staff, Andriy Yermak, after anti-corruption investigators raided his home as part of a sweeping probe. Yermaklog regarded as Zelenskyy’s closest confidant and a central figure in wartime governance and diplomacy, stepped down amidst mounting allegations that his inner circle may be implicated in a major corruption scheme tied to state contracts.
What the Scandal Involves
The scandal — part of a broad investigation known as Operation Midas — centers on alleged kickbacks and corruption tied to the state nuclear energy company Energoatom. Several senior officials, including ministers of energy and justice, have already resigned amid the uproar.
Investigators reportedly uncovered evidence of misallocated funds and questionable contracts — a scandal that resonates deeply in a country enduring war, blackouts, and widespread hardship.
While Yermak has not been formally charged, the raiding of his residence and office by the authorities triggered widespread speculation and political backlash.
Fallout: Political Instability and Loss of Trust
Yermak’s resignation represents a seismic shift in Kyiv’s wartime political architecture. He was not only the president’s gatekeeper — controlling access to Zelenskyy — but also Ukraine’s lead negotiator in international peace talks, often representing Kyiv in talks with the U.S. and other allies.
His departure leaves a vacuum at the heart of Ukraine’s decision-making process — just as the country faces intense external pressure to finalize a controversial peace plan.
Opposition lawmakers have called for a full government overhaul, arguing that replacing a single figure is insufficient given the scale of the corruption scandal. Trust in the administration has dipped, raising fears that public support could erode at a time when unity is vital.
Implications for War, Governance, and International Diplomacy
With Yermak gone, the dynamics of Ukraine’s wartime governance may shift significantly. Decision-making could become more distributed, and ministries previously sidelined may regain ground. But the loss of a central coordinating figure also risks slowing down wartime administration and complicating critical defense, diplomacy and reconstruction efforts.
Internationally, the scandal threatens to undermine confidence among Ukraine’s allies. With peace negotiations and security assistance hanging in the balance, foreign partners may demand stricter transparency and anti-corruption measures before extending further support.
What Comes Next — A Pivotal Moment for Ukraine’s Leadership
Zelenskyy has promised a reorganization of the presidential office and pledged renewed focus on the defense of Ukraine.
The big questions now are:
-
Can the next generation of leaders restore public trust and deliver real anti-corruption reforms?
-
Will Ukraine’s wartime administration remain stable enough to manage both military resistance and governance under pressure?
-
How will international partners react, especially given concerns over the proper use of aid and transparency of governance?
At this crucial juncture, the fate of Zelenskyy’s presidency — and perhaps the path of Ukraine’s wartime future — hangs in the balance.
