What’s Happening
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has contacted Capitol Police to begin arranging interviews with six Democratic members of Congress who appeared in a recent video urging U.S. military personnel not to obey “illegal orders.”
The video — released last week — featured lawmakers warning troops that they have a constitutional duty to refuse orders they believe violate the law. The FBI’s outreach signals a potential inquiry into whether the statements cross legal boundaries.
This move follows a separate investigation announced by the United States Department of Defense (Pentagon) into one of the lawmakers in the video, Mark Kelly, over possible violations of military law.
Who’s Involved
The lawmakers flagged for interviews reportedly include:
-
Elissa Slotkin (Senate)
-
Mark Kelly (Senate)
-
House members including Jason Crow, Maggie Goodlander, Chris Deluzio, and Chrissy Houlahan.
Together they encouraged service members in the video to refuse orders they believe to be illegal — a statement that has drawn sharp criticism from administration and military-aligned officials.
Why It Matters
-
The FBI’s decision to schedule interviews highlights the seriousness with which the government is treating the video, raising the possibility of legal consequences.
-
The intersection of political expression, military law, and free speech is under scrutiny. Critics argue the video attempts to politicize the chain of command; supporters contend it reflects a constitutional safeguard against unlawful orders.
-
The involvement of both the FBI and the Pentagon — especially against a lawmaker like Mark Kelly (a former service member) — escalates tension between civilian leadership, lawmakers, and military oversight.
Response & Reactions
Lawmakers targeted by the interviews have criticized the move as intimidation. For instance, Elissa Slotkin said the FBI’s Counterterrorism Division sent notice of an inquiry, calling the investigation “an attempt to scare us.”
In a joint statement, several of the House Democrats accused the administration of weaponizing federal agencies against members of Congress — asserting their actions were rooted in constitutional protections and transparency.
Meanwhile, the FBI has declined to confirm details publicly. Its director, Kash Patel, said the matter is “ongoing,” and that career agents and analysts will determine whether there is a lawful basis for an investigation.
What to Watch Next
-
Whether the interviews proceed and if they lead to formal charges or further investigations.
-
How this case influences interpretations of free speech, military obedience, and the limits of political statements related to national defense.
-
Possible long-term effects on civil-military relations and the precedent set for future congressional criticism of military orders.
Bottom line: The FBI’s effort to schedule interviews with Democratic lawmakers behind the “illegal orders” video signals a serious escalation in a politically charged controversy. The outcome could have major implications for how law, speech, and military loyalty intersect in the United States.
